The whole loop, from blank page to released grades.
Four steps. Build the work and get it to your classes, see what the results actually show, grade what came back with your judgment on top, and turn what you learned into the next exercise.
Join the waitlistBuild it, then get it to your students.
Four things you can build, from your own materials or a blank page:
Tests · seven question types across reading, vocabulary, grammar and writing. Generate a full test from your own uploaded materials, matched to your class's CEFR level, or write every question by hand.
Writing assignments · free, guided, timed, or response writing, each with its own rubric and CEFR target. A prompt check helps you set a clear task, and every submission comes back with grammar analysis and suggested feedback for you to shape.
Practice exercises · generated from the gaps your class results reveal, aimed at exactly what students got wrong.
Classes · students join with a six-character code or QR scan, or import the roster straight from Google Classroom.
Every test is a master. Each class gets its own copy, so editing the master never disturbs work already in progress.
See what the work actually shows.
Four things every submission shows you:
Vocabulary · every piece profiled A1 to C2 against a CEFR database of more than 8,800 words, with above-level words flagged before the class ever sees them.
Grammar · the patterns each student has secured and the ones still developing, quoted from their own sentences.
Writing process · how each piece came together: typing, pausing and revising, read against that student's own established rhythm.
Class analytics · results by class, test and question, plus each writer's development across the term, so you know what to reteach before the next lesson.
Every comparison is with the student's own earlier work, never with classmates. It describes. You decide.
Work through what came back.
Three things happen when the work comes in:
Objective questions score themselves · multiple choice, true or false, error correction, sentence reorder and word match, marked the instant a student submits.
Written work comes back as a draft · auto writing assessment and grading of student writing, based on language level and writing rubric, with suggested feedback.
Nothing publishes itself · all site-based assessment and feedback is designed as a draft for the teacher to shape into their own work, and nothing reaches a student until you release it.
Suggested means suggested. Accept it, rewrite it, or throw it out.
Turn what you learned into the next exercise.
Because we don't always have time to fill the gaps:
Built from real results · once a writing assignment is graded, generate practice aimed at exactly what the results showed, in a click.
Aimed at the right people · choose one student who needs it, or select the whole class where the L2 knowledge gap is shared.
Matched to level · every exercise is profiled A1 to C2, pitched at a level your students can handle and built to support the gaps in their English.
Analysis is only useful if it changes what you teach next.
Objective grading is free on every plan. Generation and written assessment use credits. See pricing.
Every student sees their own record, in full.
Their level. Their teacher's feedback, released only when their teacher is ready. The grammar patterns to practice, quoted from their own sentences. And exactly what was recorded while they wrote, explained in plain language.
No comparison with anyone else. The interpretation stays with the teacher. The record belongs to the writer.
Every decision stays with the teacher.
TeachLex just handles the busywork.
No credit card to start.